All-Time Power Ranking

Every owner-season scored 0–100 on four components, then summed into a career franchise score and averaged into a per-season power rating. Default weights are 35 / 15 / 30 / 20 — drag the sliders below, or narrow the season range further down, to see the board move.

Recomputes instantly — nothing leaves your browser.

Current weights — All-Play 35 · Scoring 15 · Postseason 30 · Title Equity 20 (Σ 100). Share this line with the league to point them at the same weighting.

Rankings, seasons played, and expected/actual titles all recompute for the selected window — owners with zero seasons in range drop off the board entirely.
RankOwnerFranchise ScorePower RatingSeasonsRate RankAll-PlayScoringPostseasonTitle EquityExp. TitlesActual TitlesTitle Luck
1Jack742.841.26181351.0170.7144.876.22.342-0.34
2Joe724.340.24183324.3144.4156.599.12.793+0.21
3Matt695.938.66184344.5159.7115.576.22.182-0.18
4Shaun649.536.08185333.2147.796.572.11.902+0.10
5Pat572.531.80189319.2133.374.145.81.331-0.33
6Chester517.134.48156279.1124.782.830.60.761+0.24
7Vinny467.329.211613258.1101.379.228.80.722+1.28
8Marco442.524.591815275.7101.142.323.40.580-0.58
9Mike402.730.981310228.8100.049.124.80.630-0.63
10Randy366.040.6692164.276.172.653.11.472+0.53
11Nate338.030.721111188.679.642.627.11.121-0.12
12Vose302.833.6497156.259.868.018.80.471+0.53
13Brent266.033.2488127.453.355.130.20.761+0.24
14Pookie257.225.721014157.360.229.710.10.250-0.25
15Worm146.229.2451287.032.39.617.20.430-0.43
16Ian118.619.7661680.217.210.610.50.260-0.26

Component columns are each component's weighted contribution to franchise score (they sum to it). Expected / Actual / Luck titles come from the schedule-luck simulation and don't move with the sliders — they do recompute with the season-range filter above, since they're a sum over whichever owner-seasons are in range. See the Schedule Luck page for the full season-by-season odds.

Methodology

The power score is a per-owner-season composite, 0–100, built from four components. Franchise score is the career sum of season scores; power rating is the per-season average (a rate stat, so it doesn't automatically reward longevity the way franchise score does).

All-Play (35%)
How you'd have finished if you'd played every team every week instead of just your actual opponent — the share of the league you outscored, week over week. We use all-play instead of raw win-loss record because raw wins are shaped by the schedule you happened to draw (see Schedule Luck — our own schedule-randomization engine shows how much a single season's record can swing on matchup order alone). All-play measures how good your roster actually was, independent of who you lined up against.
Scoring (15%)
Your points-for relative to that season's league average (PF+), rewarding teams that consistently put up big numbers regardless of how the wins landed. Scaled so roughly league-average scoring (85% of average or below) earns zero credit and anything 30 points of PF+ above that maxes out the component.
Postseason (30%)
What actually happened when it counted: a championship is worth the most, a runner-up finish less than half of that (a ring is worth about two second places), a semifinal run further back, and just making the field a little credit — scaled down in the 2008–2012 era, when 8 of 10–12 teams made the playoffs and a berth was nearly automatic. Missing the playoffs — including a Mundane Randy finish — simply earns zero; the ranking rewards success rather than piling on.
Title Equity (20%)
That season's simulated championship odds (the same title% from the Schedule Luck engine), scaled so that full credit requires winning the title in at least half of all 10,000 alternate schedules — a bar only a handful of all-time great seasons clear. An average team (roughly a 1-in-12 shot) earns about a fifth of the component. This credits "how good was this roster really" independent of how the bracket actually broke, while keeping legendary seasons like a 56%-equity year visibly ahead of merely strong ones.

If the sliders above don't sum to 100, the score is renormalized proportionally so it stays on the same 0–100 scale — the ranking only cares about each component's relative weight.